Evolution

On January 6, 2012, in Evolution, by Nararya


Addressing some misconceptions and explaining some of the basics.

Tagged with:  

16 Responses to Evolution

  1. rn502pd says:

    @Casshyr

    I tire of the continued genetic drift and mutation comments. Of course I have heard this said. What you and most evolutionist fail to understand is that genetic drift, mutation and natural selection together won’t change a species. Its never been observed and never will be. Next claim will be evolution doesn’t make that claim. But then you will still say we all have a common ancestor. Its a revolving door with evolutionist deflecting away from the evidence..

  2. Ebrainiac1 says:

    @xXsakkelaoXx
    Not sure if trolling
    Or just really stupid….

  3. DeadFishFactory says:

    @xXsakkelaoXx The big bang was not an explosion, but a rapid expansion of space. The “laws” of the universe are observations that we humans have made about it. Why the universe operates the way it does today is still a mystery, and scientists are working on that.

    And just because scientists don’t know doesn’t mean that your position is correct.

  4. zthomasack says:

    @rn502pd Ummm, no? That’s not what evolution is at all? Watch the video, seriously.

  5. zthomasack says:

    @xXsakkelaoXx Actually it can be observed and HAS BEEN OBSERVED many times, in fact I can brring up a plethora of articles for you right now that confirm that mutation occurs. Damn, you need a friggen education in biology. Heck, taking biology in 9th grade would even give you the knowledge necessary.

    Plus, you have not shown that God exists. By saying “this infinite being is called God” you have done nothing more than state a claim without any evidence to back it up.

  6. MrSethsiPodz says:

    @bchplse I never said that all of them don’t.

  7. Casshyr says:

    @rn502pd “evolution is nothing more than natural selection” => no, natural selection is only one of the forces in evolution. To spare you of boredom, i’ll just ask you to look up genetic drift for me, and also its relation to bottleneck effect. And if you are interested, look up Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and the relevant variables it tries to accommodate, and also why it fails in the end.

  8. Casshyr says:

    @rn502pd “sounds to me that evolutionist now claim nothing changed species” => no, species still change, and speciation does happen. “nothing evolved to a higher life form” => that’s an ambiguous term. Species survive as a function of fitness against the environment, and environment constantly changes. One species that is highly suited to one environment may become extinct if the environment undergoes dramatic changes in relatively rapid amount of time.

  9. YamiYami17 says:

    @bchplse Ok believe what you think is right :)
    

  10. bchplse says:

    @YamiYami17 I got what you’re saying, I thought you were trying to discredit evolution at first.

  11. SkylitDriveFan123 says:

    Hey look, an intelligent argument for evolution that isn’t “bla bla bla all Christians are creationist bla bla bla, ignorance bla”

  12. xXsakkelaoXx says:

    @DeadFishFactory If evolution (molecules to man) was correct, why would the universe even consist of logicall laws, when everything was supposedly generated by random chance and a random explosion?

  13. xXsakkelaoXx says:

    @LordYon13 With evolution, how can you even know that YOU exist? how can you trust your random brain made from chance to come to the right conclusions?

  14. rn502pd says:

    sounds to me that evolutionist now claim nothing changed species, nothing evolved to a higher life form and evolution is nothing more than natural selection. I guess the arguement is over.

  15. DeadFishFactory says:

    @xXsakkelaoXx None of the explanations for God have anything to do with logic or reason. I’ve only seen equivocations and logical fallacies.

  16. YamiYami17 says:

    @bchplse Let out the connections and the harmony of neurons (120 billion of them in the human brain) and let out all the other systems in the human body , if per generation (20-25 years) a random mutation of a new neuron is selected by natural selection, it will take 2400 billion year to come with a stuff called human brain ~
    Evolutionists don’t want to admite the intellegent design if you like to, see how : /watch?v=QsFVGCuZQe0
    or this : /watch?v=S_maLTuXBQg&feature=related

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>